Network Rail has unveiled plans to replace two level crossings with bridges in Shropshire

12-Apr-2018
Disclaimer: JT Hughes encourages opinion in the comments section below or their Facebook page but please be respectful. Offensive language is not acceptable and will be deleted. JT Hughes makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this article or found by following any link within the article.

Harlescott Level Crossing Shrewsbury

Network Rail has unveiled plans to replace two level crossings with bridges in Shropshire.

The Strategic Business Plan 2019-2024 propose the closure of the crossing at Long Lane, Craven Arms and it replaced with a bridge.

Harlescott level crossing in Shrewsbury may also be closed to traffic, and replaced with a footbridge, should proposals go ahead.

The report states “Craven Arms MCB level crossing adjacent to A49 with high traffic levels leading to an industrial estate.”

“This will enable the expansion of the industrial park adjacent to the railway as part of the local development plan for the area. A vehicle bridge is required to replace the crossing and a nearby public footpath level crossing.”

The plan stated that should the work go ahead, it will improve traffic flow, be of significant benefit to local businesses and see a maintenance risk reduction on the route.

Bridge Proposals a “Win-Win” for Craven Arms

In Craven Arms, the proposal is for the bridge to become a vehicle bridge so they can close the level crossing at Long Lane.

The plans still need funding to go ahead but could open up land for housing and would improve traffic flow into the town. Councillor for Craven Arms, David Evans told JT Hughes:

 “At the moment when the barriers are down, we get a build up of vehicles backing up on the A49.”

“A bridge over the railway line for vehicles is a great idea and I welcome this coming to fruition there will be massive opportunities for Craven Arms opening up land for businesses also land for housing.”

“This can only be a win-win situation makes good sense. But we have to get other partners on board which I would say by the amount of interest shown it can happen. We have Highways England the LEP that are on side but we still have to get funding to join this altogether to make it happen.”

“We also have to take in mind that this is in Wistanstow parish but by the dialogue, we have had with them it all seems very positive.

He added that it was a great scheme, providing great opportunities and good for Craven Arms.

Ads by JT Hughes Group
Scroll to continue with content

Harlescott Level Closure

In recent years, there have been talks on how to improve the safety of Harlescott level crossing in Shrewsbury. It is an area that has been marred with traffic delays, with level crossing data from Network Rail census in 2017 showed that the crossing is used by 17,510 vehicles and 999 pedestrians or cyclists. However, Network Rail plans to close the crossing at Harlescott by 2024 and build a footbridge, with traffic having to find an alternative route.

The busy crossing currently links the town’s incinerator, a number of businesses and industrial parks and hundreds of homes.

The report found that the crossing currently has high traffic levels and problems with blocking and that there has been significant retail development completed in the area.

“The route is working with Shropshire Council to close as part of a wider scheme to improve traffic flows around the county town. This will require a pedestrian bridge to facilitate closure.”

Network Rail said that closing the busy level crossing will benefit passengers, improve traffic flow, make the local community safer and be of benefit to local businesses.

According to the plans, Harlescott level crossing currently holds the 47th highest risk crossing on the routes, and that works could reduce performance and maintenance risks.

Concern over the safety of the crossing was highlighted last year, following the tragic death of a 14-year-old boy after he was hit by a train at the crossing and then later died in hospital.

This sparked a petition that called for improved safety and security at the crossing.

Some respondents to the petition commented on the barriers not working properly and questioned whether a bridge would be a possibility.

Mixed Feelings of over Harlescott Crossing Closure

The proposed closure of Harlescott level crossing has invited a mixed response. The Twitter account for The Bear Steps in Shrewsbury questioned where all the traffic would go should the plans go ahead.

 

Chris Oldham, who worked in traffic management for 40 years and was responsible for implementing the Shrewsbury Park & Ride scheme, has concerns over how successful the plans for closing Harlescott level crossing would be.

He told Shropshire Star: “First of all with the closer at the crossing, the traffic has to go somewhere and the only two realistic alternatives I can see are Mount Pleasant Road or Battlefield Link Road.”

“Mount Pleasant Road is pretty well saturated already and as any traffic manager or traffic planner would know, when you are close to saturation, it does not require many more vehicles to cause a massive increase in the queue lengths.”

He added that introducing a bridge to replace the level crossing would likely be prohibitively expensive.

When asked about what the best solution would be he said that with no limit on money, it would be to put a bridge there.

Motorists Risking Lives on Wem Level Crossing

People are continuing to put their lives and those of rail passengers at risk at the notorious Wem railway crossing.

New figures revealed by Network Rail show that since the beginning of 2015, there have been 14 recorded incidents around the crossing. The majority of the incidents were trespassing, including a car jumping the lights to cross the crossing.

The crossing has been plagued with problems since becoming automated in 2013. It has also been previously named as one of the most dangerous crossings in the country.

In March 2015, the barriers failed to close despite a train coming through. Network Rail said the problem was caused by a temporary road diversion sign being picked up by sensors.

Members of Wem Train Station Safer Group have called for a footbridge to be created over the town’s train station after two people climbed over the barriers after a technical hitch saw it shut for an hour.

Why Are Level Crossings Closed?

Closing a level crossing is a contentious issue within many communities. But level crossings have are a part of our rail network that while keeps us safe, no longer fits with our transport infrastructure.

There are around 6,000 level crossings in Britain which are a legacy of a railway built 150 years ago when there were fewer and slower trains and no cars on the road. If you were to build a railway today, it would have no level crossings. For example, HS1 has no level crossings.  

In 2010, Network Rail embarked on its national safety awareness and improvements programme, with £100 million being invested in order to help to improve the safety of level crossings. This is running alongside a safety awareness campaign aimed at specific user groups.

The program works with local communities to find safer ways to cross the railway – above or beneath or via an alternative route so they can close the crossing.

Network Rail completes risk assessments of level crossings at regular intervals, taking into consideration a number of factors such as the crossing’s location, how much traffic it receives and the crossing’s history of accidents and near misses.  They may also be considered suitable for closure as part of a larger investment and upgrade scheme.

Remaining Safe at Level Crossings

Safety on the railway is regularly highlighted when it comes to level crossings, with Network Rail’s reinforcing the importance of driver safety.

There was an increase in near misses reported at level crossings in 2015/16 with non-vehicle road users. However, the same data shows a sustained reduction in the number of near misses with road vehicles.

At level crossings drivers need to:

•    Be prepared to stop at a crossing

•    Understand the warnings (lights, barriers, alarms)

•    If the warnings activate, stop – unless it's unsafe to do so

•    Remain stationary until all the warnings stop

•    Check that the exit is clear before driving across

Network Rail also warn that trespassing on the railway is illegal and dangerous and those caught could be taken to court and face a £1,000 fine.

 

 

10 Comments
User Icon
P Hitchcock
-
5/9/2018 12:54:12 PM
9-May-2018
I use this route to visit dentist, recycling depot, furrows and Charlie’s. In the past 18 years I have never been held up longer than five minutes. There is nothing wrong with the crossing, perhaps better signage and a shelter with seat for pedestrians to wait out of the rain. Maybe restricted vehicles will help it reduce waiting times and wear and tear. This crossing works well nearly all of the time, it is unnessary to make such huge changes. Children should be taught about road safety, and that includes level crossings as well as pedestrian crossings. Motorists should be patient and considerate to other road users. Common sense is needed, not a bridge and road closure.
User Icon
Martin McGowan
-
5/2/2018 12:35:02 AM
2-May-2018
Last Thursday, 26th April the crossing had to be closed for road repairs adjoining the crossing, well one lane was closed but they decided that they would close the road. Mount pleasant was jammed, battlefield link road was jammed, A49 was jammed, Whitchurch road was jammed. It was a nightmare and they think they can do this permanently, they are insane. this afternoon, tuesday 1st may i counted all the cars waiting to use the crossing after a normal closure for a passenger train, ie about three to four minutes, there were 55 cars in the queue at about 1610
User Icon
Emma
-
4/28/2018 12:12:33 AM
28-Apr-2018
The crossing at Harlescott was shut for emergency repairs just yesterday this caused massive traffic issues on Harlescott Lane Lancaster Road and beyond closing this crossing to traffic would impact the local residents dramatically bus routes would also be hugely disrubted. The five minutes you have to wait for a passing train is far less frastration than having a complete detour. A bridge is the better option by far.
User Icon
Sue Rose
-
4/25/2018 1:54:31 PM
25-Apr-2018
We live in Harlscott and yes it is frustrating when we have to wait for trains. I don't know how it will work for us to get to Tescos etc apart from having to do a major detour. Perhaps it will make the general traffic less. There needs to be a pedestrian crossing near the Harlscott estate as getting to the other side is really difficult. Yes what would happen to the buses that go round the estate.?
User Icon
james
-
4/24/2018 2:56:08 PM
24-Apr-2018
Why don't we just stop the trains how many use it ? Seriously though it's a very busy section of road and would be detrimental to a lot of business and as route for general traffic.
User Icon
Mark R
-
4/17/2018 10:24:58 PM
17-Apr-2018
You have only to look at the rest of the traffic planning in town to realise what a total cock up this idea would be. Traffic planning with eyes shut me thinks
User Icon
Clive Graham
-
4/17/2018 3:42:04 AM
17-Apr-2018
The fake facts in this attempted piece of responsible Journalism are incredible. It says that approximately 600 cars per day pass over Harlescott level crossing in Shrewsbury. The traffic flow is over 20,000 vehicles per day ! If the journalist had been bothered to count the traffic for even 30 minutes they would have seen how false their 600 figure was. It goes without saying that closing a road carrying over 20,000 vehicles per day without any alternative provision would cause complete traffic chaos. It is therefore entirely false for Network Rail to say that closing the crossing and replacing it with a footbridge would ‘improve traffic flow’. They should visit the town and see how impracticable their proposal is before issuing press releases which are plainly naive.
User Icon
Richard Bonella
-
4/16/2018 6:22:46 PM
16-Apr-2018
The law in England seems to allow the railway companies to exercise powers well beyond what others have. So they probably do have the necessary authority to close the crossing. But which came first: the railway or the Featherbed Lane? This seems to be the kind of high-handed action that alienates public opinion; we have seen where that leads.
User Icon
Martin McGowan
-
4/16/2018 5:05:57 PM
16-Apr-2018
they have to be joking about closing the harlescott crossing, two bus services use the crossing along with a lot more than 600 cars a day (you get over 70 vehicles backed up for a normal crossing closure and over a 100 for a twin train closure. Mount pleasant is already at saturation point along with the whitchurch road for traffic trying the other way. The crossing was made worse when they changed from local control to central control increasing the wait times for cars
User Icon
Andy Brinkley
-
4/16/2018 4:50:40 PM
16-Apr-2018
You can not be serious routes are already congested enough closing this will be a disaster only solution is put in a bridge
Disclaimer
All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. JT Hughes makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. JT Hughes will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information.JT Hughes will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. JT Hughes does not share personal information with third-parties nor does JT Hughes store information collected about your visit for use other than to analyse content performance through the use of cookies, which you can turn off at anytime by modifying your Internet browser’s settings. JT Hughes is not responsible for the republishing of the content found on this blog on other Web sites or media without permission. JT Hughes reserves the right to edit or delete any comments submitted to this blog without notice due to; 1. Comments deemed to be spam or questionable spam 2. Comments including profanity 3. Comments containing language or concepts that could be deemed offensive 4. Comments that attack a person individually. This policy is subject to change at anytime.
Visit us
JT Hughes
Showrooms
Newtown Honda
Pool Road, Newtown
Powys SY163BD
Phone: 01686 622300
Newtown Mitsubishi
Pool Road, Newtown
Powys SY163BD
Phone: 01686 622300
Shrewsbury Honda
3 Battlefield Road, Shrewsbury
Shropshire SY14AB
Phone: 01743 440999
Shrewsbury Hyundai
3 Battlefield Road, Shrewsbury
Shropshire SY14AB
Phone: 01743 450888
Telford Honda
Stafford Park 1, Stafford Park Telford
Shropshire TF33BD
Phone: 01952 200999
Telford Mitsubishi
Stafford Park 1, Stafford Park Telford
Shropshire TF33BD
Phone: 01952 299822
Company information:
JT Hughes(Oswestry) Ltd, 5 Battlefield Road, Shrewsbury, SY14AB. Company Registration Number is 1198620 registered to JT Hughes(Oswestry) Ltd
JT Hughes(Oswestry) Ltd which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority for insurance mediation activities only. All calls may be recorded for training, monitoring and quality purposes.
Copyright: © JT Hughes (Oswestry) Ltd: All rights reserved. Users may download and print extracts of content from this website for their own personal and non commercial use only.
Unauthorised republication or redistribution of content, including by framing, spidering or similar means, is expressly prohibited

Who regulates us?
J. T. Hughes (Oswestry) Ltd, 5 Battlefield Road, Shrewsbury, SY14AB. Our FCA number is 306434.
J. T. Hughes (Oswestry) Ltd's permitted business is arranging general insurance contracts
You can check this on the FCA's register by visiting the FSA's website or by contacting the FSA on 0800 111 6768.
Motor Industry Code Of Practice
We subscribe to the Motor Industry Codes of Practice for New Cars and for Service and Repair and are members of the National Franchise Dealers Association. Click here for more details.