Call for 20mph Speed Limit on Shropshire Streets

10-Oct-2017
  Author: Emma McCarthy
Disclaimer: JT Hughes encourages opinion in the comments section below or their Facebook page but please be respectful. Offensive language is not acceptable and will be deleted. JT Hughes makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this article or found by following any link within the article.

A conference held in Shrewsbury on 20mph speed limits heard that Shropshire is significantly worse than the England average for killed or seriously injured on the roads and how a 20mph speed limit can help save lives.

90277f50de822f4c44e6adbca7bf479d2d27

Over 50 delegates attended the conference including Shropshire Council councillors, parish and town councillors and local campaigners who heard the case for a general wide-area 20mph speed limit to improve road safety.

The national “20’s Plenty for Us” campaign has groups in Ludlow, Shrewsbury, Church Stretton, Oswestry and Shifnal. It says that a reduction in the speed limit from 30mph to 20mph can dramatically increase the chances of a pedestrian or cyclist surviving an accident and has environmental and public health benefits.

Killed by road accidents in Shropshire

Source: Shropshire Health Profile 2017

General 20mph Speed Limit a “No-brainer”

Professor John Whitelegg, conference organiser spoke to JT Hughes about his frustration at the lack of support from Shropshire Council and West Mercia Police and Crime Commissioner for a general 20mph speed limit.

He said that a general 20mph speed limit is a “no-brainer” and supported by public health organisations and individuals but not in Shropshire. 

“Every 30mph limit in Shropshire should be redesignated as a 20mph limit. The reason there is a debate about zones is that one street is 30mph and another is 20mph. There will be a bigger impact on road safety if every street is designated at 20mph.”

Campaigners say that a general 20mph speed limit on all residential roads is a proven, highly effective public health measure that saves lives, encourages walking and cycling, and reduces pressure on A&E, reduces congestion and reduces air pollution.

Urging Shropshire Council to take action, John added: “Please can we improve road safety. We do have a problem in Shropshire, compounded by the director of public health who isn’t open to looking at the evidence.”

30mph is “Unjust and Unjustified”

Rod King MBE, Founder and Campaign Director for the national 20’s Plenty for Us, who spoke at the conference in Shropshire told JT Hughes that a 20mph limit is a foundation for public health and road safety.

It’s not just about reducing casualties but also the fear of becoming a casualty. 20mph is a key milestone in speeds. Children have very much reduced skills when processing information about vehicles travelling above 20mph.”

According to statistics from the Department for Transport published two weeks ago, of the 129,837 reported causalities in 2016 on built-up roads, 105,981 were on 30mph roads. Figures also show that 588 (11 a week) were killed and a further 12,849 (246 a week) were seriously injured on 30mph roads.

Rod King recently said: “Across the world 30mph (50kmh) limits are being replaced by 20mph (30kmh) as the right standard where motor vehicles mix with pedestrians and cyclists.”

“The 30mph limit that was plucked out of the air in 1934 as being better than no limit is no longer fit for purpose.”

“It is unjust, unjustifiable and needs to be consigned to history. A routinely enforced 20mph limit should be the new urban norm with higher speeds only allowed on those roads that protect pedestrians and cyclists with appropriate crossing and segregated facilities.”

“It would transform our urban environment and be the foundation for a healthier and more productive nation.”

The World Health Organisation (WHO) says that “Best practice suggests that when motorized traffic mixes with pedestrians and cyclists, travelling speeds should be under 30 km/h.”

“A safe speed on roads with possible conflicts between cars and pedestrians, cyclists and other vulnerable road users is 30 km/h (20mph)”

Will Blanket 20mph on All Streets Work?

There is no disputing the evidence: being hit by a car at 20mph increases your chances of surviving than if you were hit at 30mph. However, reducing casualties does rely on drivers following the speed limit.

So far, 25 percent of the UK population currently have a general 20mph speed limit in place with statistics showing a reduction in casualties.

In Newcastle, a 2007 study of eight, 20mph limit areas in residential areas showed 56 percent fewer casualties. Lancashire County Council reported in 2014, following an independent assessment into the early phases of the program, interim results showed a 30 percent decrease in casualties. The highways authority Lancashire County Council has rolled out a 20mph limit across 200 streets across St Annes.

Meanwhile, in Scotland, there is a proposed bill to replace the current 30mph default speed limit on restricted roads with a 20mph limit.

Emma Bullard from the Green Party in Shropshire attended the conference and spoke to JT Hughes about her support for the Shropshire campaign and how 20mph on all streets would be more effective than 20mph zones.

“The problem with 20mph zones is that they start outside and people brake suddenly. The whole journey to school is not addressed, so there are lots of things wrong with this.”

“There is the expense of installing speed humps, whereas drivers could get used to a speed change, so rather it be a 30mph default it’s a 20mph default speed limit.”

Rod King added: “It also makes for a calmer and less stressful environment for all road users.”

Drivers Ignoring ‘20’s Plenty’ Campaign in Shifnal

Shropshire Star reported in June this year that the 20’s Plenty campaign was being ignored by drivers, with a survey saying that 11.5 percent of cars travelling over 35 mph.

Keith Dovaston, member of Shifnal Neighbourhood Watch says in the report: “Is ‘20’s Plenty’ working? The answer at this stage is no.”

“On ‘20’s plenty’ only areas around schools and town centre, with regards to all other roads, there must be enforcement either by police or community speed-watch in the first instance.”

“Owing to lack of police resources and time, a community speed watch group could monitor certain roads and streets and identify areas and time of day in which the problem of speeding is occurring and work with police to save time and effort plus valuable resources.” 

Speeding Drivers Shamed by Kids’ Courts

In the West Midlands, police are committed to ensuring the 20mph speed limits are rigorously enforced, saying on their blog that drivers ignored the 30mph limit for decades, so it is no surprise that the same goes for 20mph limits.

They said: “We know 20mph limits are evidently the most important speed limit to our communities, and have the largest potential of any limit to positively affect lifestyle choices and reduce the amount of people killed or seriously injured on our roads, so why not enforce them?”

“Those who oppose the idea will in time come around as the concepts of ‘children being able to play in the street, cycle to school, parents taking the healthier option to walk or cycle to the shops’ become a reality as the motor vehicle, for so long the negative influence that prevents positive lifestyle choices, is forced into community chosen compliance where it still has a large part to play to the transport infrastructure of our region, but a safer and healthier one.”

These measures have been complemented by ‘kids’ courts’ where speeding drivers who have been caught in Birmingham are questioned by and have to explain their actions to a jury of 11-year-olds at the local school.

20mph Not “One-Size-Fits-All”

Police and Crime Commissioner for West Merica, John Campion provided a statement to JT Hughes which saying that alterations to the speed limit are a decision for local authorities and a 20mph zone only works in certain circumstances.  

He said: “These decisions should be made on a case by case basis, dependant on the needs of the local community.

“I agree that 20mph zones work in certain circumstances, such as outside schools or in small sections of town centres but I don’t feel that a one size fits all approach of imposing blanket 20mph zones is effective.”

He added: “I will continue to listen to the specific needs of our communities, in relation to speeding, and I have taken a number of steps to ensure these are addressed.

“This includes traffic calming measures, improved signage and the investment I have made in the Community Speedwatch Scheme, empowering people to take an active role in the issues that matter to them.

“I will continue to hold West Mercia Police to account to ensure that measures are being taken to keep our roads safer and that they continue to work with the Safer Roads Partnership on initiatives which will reduce speeding and keep the public safe.”

20mph Policy Will Not Address Rural Road Safety Concern

Councillor Lee Chapman and Councillor Steve Davenport provided position statement saying:

“Shropshire Council is very much focussed on Road safety and recognises it’s an important issue for all of Shropshire’s resident and visitors to the county.

“There is, of course, a shared responsibility for promoting safety on our highways. There is a role for each of us as pedestrians, cyclists and drivers, as well as the role local and national government play to promote safe systems.”

 “Shropshire Council recognises that the scheme known as “20s Plenty” offers one approach to promoting road safety and indeed 20 mph zones exist in some parts of the County. Shropshire Council also recognises that this model focuses on urban communities whereas Shropshire is a predominantly rural area.”

“It has been suggested that Shropshire Council should adopt a “20s Plenty” policy across all its urban areas, however, such an approach will not address the major road safety concern locally, that is serious accidents on rural roads.”

“The data available over several years indicates that most serious accidents, including those that resulted in a death, were on our rural roads. Many of these accidents involve a single vehicle and its occupants, with no other people involved.”

“Accidents on rural roads were generally of a more serious nature than those on urban roads. In view of this pattern, there appears to be a limited basis for adopting a universal “20s Plenty” across our towns and villages. That said Shropshire Council is willing to work with communities where there is strong support for creating a 20 mph zone. “

“Where such a scheme was to be adopted Shropshire Council would not be in favour of introducing measures such as “speed humps” as there appears to be mixed evidence of their effectiveness in reducing the speed of vehicles.”

Local Support Growing for Campaign

Ironically the adoption of a general 20mph limit seems to be going slowly, but John Whitelegg is confident that it will happen.

He praised Ludlow campaigners who went door-to-door to conduct a survey and revealed that 94 percent of those who gave a response want the speed limit in their street reduced to 20mph, with 80 percent supporting a 20mph limit across town.

The majority of those who attended the conference in Shrewsbury supported a call for a policy decision on the wide-area 20mph as soon as possible and implementation to begin in the financial year 2018-2019. The agreed text was sent to all Shropshire Council cabinet members. 

There will be a public meeting at the United Reform Church in Shrewsbury, Coleham Head, SY3 7BJ at 3pm on Saturday 25th November to discuss Shropshire Council’s reply to the request.

Supporters can join a local campaign, purchase stickers to go on wheelie bins, windows or car bumpers. 

Emma Bullard also advised that people can get involved by writing to their councillor or take inspiration from campaigners in Ludlow and carry out a survey.

THE AUTHOR

Emma McCarthy

Emma McCarthy is a freelance writer for Positive Advertising. Emma studied journalism at the University of Lincoln and now spends her days writing on a variety of topics including lifestyle, technology, and business. She splits her time between Shropshire and Yorkshire, and when not writing or looking after her young son, Emma loves to relax by going for long walks, exploring the seaside and indulging in cream teas.
5 Comments
User Icon
Brian Hawcroft
-
10/21/2017 10:26:17 AM
22 hours ago
It's a shame that human beings generally are so stupidly selfish and unobservant. This applies to both drivers and pedestrians. I would be in favour of all medium to large towns and cities being traffic free, with well distributed cheap or free park and ride services and vast increase in public transport services. Of course, no authority would go for this due to the costs involved. Just drive SENSIBLY wherever you are and, whether driver OR pesdestrian, pay attention to conditions/restrictions on whatever road or street you are on.
User Icon
Christopher DeBanks
-
10/15/2017 12:46:28 PM
Sunday
What a fantastic idea blanket coverage for a 20 mph speed limit, just think of the advantages, more work for people making wooden handles, more work for people making cotton fabric, more work for people sewing, more work for people making shoes, there are 36.7 million vehicles on the road, there are 1.6 million unemployed we could wipe that figure out in one go give a motorist a red flag and operator. Sorted
User Icon
stuart mold
-
10/15/2017 11:22:10 AM
Sunday
An approach which merely reduces the speed will only have have a positive impact if ALL road users obey some common sense.Pedestrians who 'jay walk' and cyclists who continue to ride in pairs abreast (common occurrence on narrow A roads) should be 'on the spot fined'. If one wants to reduce potential injury to pedestrians than a principle of H/S is to mitigate/negate risk-stop mixing these two competing flows; design road and pedestrian routes to move in separate streams -this would have the necessary reduction in injury and death; the statistics prove this to be the case, merely needs investment.
User Icon
Keith Alexander
-
10/14/2017 4:19:11 PM
7 days ago
I appreciate no end of bean counters and do gooders may well have a valid point in their often narrow minded self gratifying ideas e.g. lowering the limit. However perhaps enforcing the existing ones properly might also have the desired effect. I am one of those people that consciously obeys the limit and I am constantly punished for it. I spend my entire time being tail gated or carved up by increasingly aggressive drivers as a result. I.e. I am at personal risk of being rear ended or even attacked whilst driving at 30 in some locations, god knows what would happen to a lot of people if we tried to drive at 20 MPH jerking along in 2nd gear!
User Icon
Brian Corbett
-
10/14/2017 2:43:20 PM
7 days ago
I agree the current 30mph limit is absurd: it takes no notice whatsoever of time, place, road conditions, weather, surface traffic, pedestrians, cyclists, animals - and much much more. due to long-changed (50+ years) work and lifestyle patterns, the vast majority of residential and village roads have no-one on them during working hours. Thus, the 30mph limit is absurdly LOW - and 40 or 50 mph would be much mroe appropriate on dry days from 9-5 and again (in summer) in daylight hours in the early mornings and at weekends. Similarly, in winter, outside schools, on foggy, gloomy days at at school leving times, 30 mph is far too FAST. Adaptive speed limits are clearly the answer and some clot claiming 20mph will save lives just makes my blood boil. More lives would be saved with a 5mph limit; making cars entirely of foam rubber; banning all pedestrians; TEACHING THE GREEN CROSS CODE; NOT looking at your phone, with a hood up and earplugs in when walking; and not being drunk or drugged up when staggering across the road at night.
Disclaimer
All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. JT Hughes makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. JT Hughes will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information.JT Hughes will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. JT Hughes does not share personal information with third-parties nor does JT Hughes store information collected about your visit for use other than to analyse content performance through the use of cookies, which you can turn off at anytime by modifying your Internet browser’s settings. JT Hughes is not responsible for the republishing of the content found on this blog on other Web sites or media without permission. JT Hughes reserves the right to edit or delete any comments submitted to this blog without notice due to; 1. Comments deemed to be spam or questionable spam 2. Comments including profanity 3. Comments containing language or concepts that could be deemed offensive 4. Comments that attack a person individually. This policy is subject to change at anytime.
Visit us
JT Hughes
Showrooms
Newtown Honda
Pool Road, Newtown
Powys SY163BD
Phone: 01686 622300
Newtown Mitsubishi
Pool Road, Newtown
Powys SY163BD
Phone: 01686 622300
Shrewsbury Honda
3 Battlefield Road, Shrewsbury
Shropshire SY14AB
Phone: 01743 440999
Shrewsbury Hyundai
3 Battlefield Road, Shrewsbury
Shropshire SY14AB
Phone: 01743 450888
Telford Honda
Stafford Park 1, Stafford Park Telford
Shropshire TF33BD
Phone: 01952 200999
Telford Mitsubishi
Stafford Park 1, Stafford Park Telford
Shropshire TF33BD
Phone: 01952 299822
Company information:
JT Hughes(Oswestry) Ltd, 5 Battlefield Road, Shrewsbury, SY14AB. Company Registration Number is 1198620 registered to JT Hughes(Oswestry) Ltd
JT Hughes(Oswestry) Ltd which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority for insurance mediation activities only. All calls may be recorded for training, monitoring and quality purposes.
Copyright: © JT Hughes (Oswestry) Ltd: All rights reserved. Users may download and print extracts of content from this website for their own personal and non commercial use only.
Unauthorised republication or redistribution of content, including by framing, spidering or similar means, is expressly prohibited

Who regulates us?
J. T. Hughes (Oswestry) Ltd, 5 Battlefield Road, Shrewsbury, SY14AB. Our FCA number is 306434.
J. T. Hughes (Oswestry) Ltd's permitted business is arranging general insurance contracts
You can check this on the FCA's register by visiting the FSA's website or by contacting the FSA on 0800 111 6768.
Motor Industry Code Of Practice
We subscribe to the Motor Industry Codes of Practice for New Cars and for Service and Repair and are members of the National Franchise Dealers Association. Click here for more details.